One of the key insights from the graph on the left is the consistent presence of South African players who attended boys-only schools, a pattern I explored in my 2020 paper [Noorbhai, H. (2020). Attending boys-only schools: is it an incidental or a strategic contributing factor to South African cricket development and success? African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences (AJPHES), 26(1), 21-40.]. More here in my OP-ED: The Conversation.
This trend suggests that attending such schools may be a strategic contributor to cricketing success in South Africa.
* However, it’s not just South Africa that shows interesting trends. New Zealand, Australia and England also have a notable representation of players from private or boys-only schools. This could reflect the strong tradition of elite sports education in these nations, where private institutions often offer superior facilities and coaching.
* Sri Lanka, although similar to the above, exhibits a more balanced pattern, possibly indicating a broader talent pool from diverse educational backgrounds, or different selection processes where schooling might be less of a factor.
* Pakistan (the lowest), India and West Indies have lower numbers, which might suggest a focus on broader public schooling systems or different pathways to cricketing success that do not heavily rely on elite educational structures. The West Indies, with their unique cricketing heritage, reflect the changing dynamics of cricket development across the Caribbean.